Thursday, February 24, 2011

Music the good and the bad by Mike MacDonald

RANT!

So today, I decided I'm just going to rant and rave about one of my favourite things!  Music!  Now this is all my personal opinion.  I'm going to talk about my beliefs and my opinions on music and the industry.  There will be no pictures in this rant, just me and my wonderful text.

So let's begin.  I'll be honest, I'm not very open minded when it comes to music.  Well I shouldn't say that.  I'm open minded, but I'm very set in my ways.  I do enjoy a fairly large spectrum of music.  This ranges from punk, hard rock, film score, and more.  But my main obsession is Metal.  Metal has a lot of stereotypes associated with it, but I'm not going to get into those.. because the problem with stereotypes is that.. well they're stereotypes, stereotypes are great misconceptions of what the genre and it's people actually are.  Especially since Metal as a whole is made up of various other genres such ass blues, classical, and many others.  I enjoy metal the most because of this fact.  Metal has a very wide range, as do other genres, but metal remains to be unique.  Of course there are a lot of bands in the genre today that tend to be and sound exactly the same..  The worst part is, a lot of these bands are big now.  This annoys me.

The mainstream music scene saddens me greatly, because there is a lot of unheard talent out there that is unique and doesn't get the chance to be heard.

The first problem I'm going to state is the pop culture phenomenon.. American Idol.
I watched the first season of American Idol, and maybe even the second season, because I was interested in what the judges had to say, and I wanted to see if people were any good.  After that, I stopped watching and judging from my point of view, because I realized that none of these people are being judged correctly, and there are so many "pop" singers today, that it's hard to actually know who they are.  I honestly could not tell the difference between Lady Gaga and Kesha or whatever their names are.  This could be due to that I'm not really immersed in the media, and don't really care about these artists.  But the reason I don't care who they are is because neither of them were unique to me.  This is the case with American Idol. All of the contestants sound the same, all of the people who win you either don't really hear about, or they sound exactly like another artist..  Usually the person that wins will sound like the person who won last year. 

Another problem I have with this is that all of the contestants are judged mainly on their voice...  Their range, wether or not they understand pitch and can control their voice in that way.  Yes, they are good singers obviously...  But, are they good songwriters?  I really could care less how high of notes you can hit.  Ya, it's impressive, but you don't get famous and successful from performing someone elses material...  That's what these contestants are judged on!  How good they can sing someone elses work!  What kind of competition is that?  These people should be forced to write their own material and sing their own material.  Because the people who win, could very well be an amazing singer, but could be a horrible song writer...  I'll give you an example of Clay Aiken from one of the earlier seasons...  He is not a good song writer..  "If I was Invisible"?  His single sounded more like he was being a stalker than anything.  I know some of these performers have other people writing the songs.. and they should be to blame for being bad.  Than that still just emphasizes the point that, they're not writing their own stuff...  They don't deserve it.

I feel very strongly about this obviously, and I refuse to watch the competition, or any other competition that relies on people performing songs from other people.  It's the same thing I think about with musicians.  Ya, you can play guitar really fast, but can you write something with that?  I consider myself to be a fairly rounded guitarist, more average really.  I know my limits and I know what I'm capable of, and I can properly apply that to my writing, if something I write is more difficult for me, than I learn how to do it.  I think of myself to be a fairly good songwriter, I write music all of the time, I probably have 3-4 albums worth right now of material.  These people that are on American Idol and similar shows have probably never written a song in their lives.  If you can sing, but can't write, well.. I'm sorry, but you don't deserve to be famous and successful, maybe you can be a vocal coach or something.  People who get big from other peoples material, and people who get big through American Idol are taking the places of people that have real talent.  The music industry seems to be a little lazy from my point of view.  Let's just have a competition and let the nation decide.  The more popular they are the better they must be right?

WRONG!  Over half of the population is probably tone deaf, and they choose the person they feel has the best personality or is the best eye candy.  I'm just angry and sad that the music industry has fallen so far that they just keep making copies of singers.  Once one singer gets older and people like them a little less, they pop out another one!  Hence why American Idol has so many fucking awful seasons.

I could go on about how bad the industry is today.. but, what about the good?  Well, the good of the music industry is the older music.  There are some new good artists today, but these artists are no where near as popular as most of the mainstream pop copies.  70's music, 80's music, 90's music, and a little bit of modern music, and even further back.  Back in these decades, people didn't even have to know how to sing!  Singing was a point of view, a style of the voice.  Some people spoke to their songs, some people yelled to their songs, and some people sang with heat, anger, and emotion.  This is the good music.  These people can write good music, which is very rare in todays society.  The problem with music, is that it's a very personal thing to those who are greatly immersed into it and have strong opinions.  But a lot of society just listen to what's popular because, they think it must be good if it's popular.  These are the people I call drones..  Because they don't try and discover what kind of music they like, they fall into social norms and expectations.  Their friend listens to Katy Perry.. so they listen to her too.  That being said, I don't really like Katy Perry, but she is actually an artist I can pick out on the radio,  so she must be doing something right.  So maybe that was a bad example.  But people mostly listen to the music their friends like.  I know because I used to be the same way, and in High School it was considered "cool" to listen to Iron Maiden, even though people didn't properly understand or respect just how good Iron Maiden was.  I know this because they would always talk about the same select songs that were sooooo good.  Ya those songs are good, but there's more than just their "popular" songs.  Most songs that are popular aren't the best, because music is such a personal thing, other songs besides the singles etc. will resonate much better than others.

I believe my opinion on music is very insightful.  No, I don't listen to everything, but I don't like everything, and music is a very personal taste.  Music is, and should be emotional and really reflect the kind of person you are.  Which brings me to my main point about music.  The disrespect of certain genres.  There are different genres that I will not listen to, because I honestly just can't stand it and the musicians associated with it...  One of those being Country music... Country music is by no means unique in any way in my opinion..  It's predictable, all of the singers sound the same, and it's just not unique, if you've herd one country song you've heard them all, technically and lyrically.

I'm a strong believer that there is no such thing as bad music.  There's not, because there will always be some people that like a certain style.  Whether that be country, rap, metal, rock, jazz, etc. etc.  You can't say one genre is bad, because there will always be someone there to defend it.  Country as I said before, I really hate.  But the fact is, is that it does resonate with some people, regardless of my technical, insightful, educated opinion on it.  So if you're going to talk about music with someone.. Please leave your ignorance at the door.  We all have our reasons for liking something, just because our opinion differs doesn't mean we're right about it.  That's the thing about opinions, there is no right opinion in anything, because every opinion is personal and mainly relies on likes and dislikes, and everyone has different like's and dislikes.

I could keep going on the topic, but I think I'm going to end my rant there.  On another note, there is a battle of the bands happening in May, in my home town of Miramichi!

I did this all by myself :)
Join the facebook group or at least check it out, many different genres will be playing and I hope many people attend and support.  http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=183991791639239

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Shameless Promotions 1! by Mike MacDonald

I thought this was hilarious, so I'm gonna use it.
This is a little segment that I decided I should do every so often called Shameless Promotions!  This is where I take random things I like and things I think that should be brought to the spotlight because, well, it's good stuff, and I know it, and my opinion is the only opinion.  Not really, but really.

The first thing I'm going to promote is myself.  I'd say that's something pretty shameless to start off with.  Now where to begin... Because you know, I've got plenty of awesome traits.


ChronoshifT!  This is my music project.  I write all of the music for this project, play all of the instruments including the vocal work.  I also record all of it as well, and design all of the logo's artwork etc. etc.  (I'm actually pretty good with HTML and web design and all that stuff, I just don't feel like putting much of that effort into the blog..  Would loose it's... mystique!).  Right now I'm a one man band, and I'm hoping for that to change at some point.  You can check out this stuff at any of the following pages!

http://www.myspace.com/chronoshiftmetal
http://www.youtube.com/csofficial
http://www.twitter.com/chronoshiftmdm
http://www.facebook.com/pages/ChronoshifT/125506318597

This link is very important, this link is to help promote this further!  With your help the music can spread to the audience it's supposed to be heard by and have the fanbase grow.  Even if you don't like metal music, helping out people is always nice and will leave you feeling much better about yourself!

http://signmeto.roadrunnerrecords.com/artists/chronoshift

Go there, if you need to create a fan account or whatever it's called, it doesn't take long, give ChronoshifT some high ratings, pick my songs and pick me as an artist, you can also leave an "anonymous" nice review :D!

Shameless enough?  I think so.  Now lets shamelessly promote someone that deserves it!

One of my old college buddies has a well formed, well worded, intelligent blog.  Unlike the things I talk about on here, he portrays things that actually matter to people.  He writes about interesting topics and gives his honest opinion, which I respect!

(on a side note I'm in a cafeteria, and an old lady asked another old lady "Where'd you get that?!" "My son got it from the internet!"  No referal of website or company or anything.. Just the internet..  Some kind of contraption to help quit smoking.  I thought that was pretty funny and thought you people might like it!)

Sorry, got off topic... Where was I?  O YA!

If you'd like to check out Beef Pattie, you can check it out at the link I'm providing under the unneeded, continuting, procrastinating, ongoing............................text.

Beef Pattie - http://beefpattie.com/

He also is a damn good graphic designer!  You can probably hire him if you want, I'm sure he likes money, of course if there's a problem with this or any shameless promotions I put on here, I will take them down right away, but who doesn't like free promotion?!  (I've mispelled Promotion as Pomotion like 10 times, so this is taking me forever...  We might just stick with that for the rest of the post.)

Here's the link to his graphic design page I'm pomoting!

N.J.D. Designs - http://njddesigns.com/

Well...  That's our Shameless Pomotions for today!  If you think you've got some good stuff, whether it be a blog, youtube channel, website, business etc. etc.  If it's good, respectable, not stupid, and not creepy I might put it up.  Of course the amount of people reading this probably won't be of much help in pomoting, but I need something to write about once and a while when I'm stumped, so help me, help you, help me.

--
pomoted by
Mike MacDonald

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Xbox 360 vs PS3 by Mike MacDonald


So, earlier today I was on facebook, i'm not gonna bullshit you.. I use facebook more frequently than I would like to admit... So I don't admit it.  I've been doing this 30 days of gaming thing like a bunch of other people.  It's where you post 1 picture per day for 30 days of what game suits that day, the days being best gameplay, or, saddest game moment. etc. etc.  I won't get into detail on that.  One of my friends posted they're console of choice today, that being Xbox 360.  You can only imagine that PS3 fanboys started coming out to bash it of course...  But you see this pretty much anywhere someone posts anything about one console or the other.  I'm not just pointing fingers at PS3 fanboys either, 360 fanboys are just as bad.

The thing that really makes me mad though is ignorance.  If you think something is better, or if something is horrible, back up your damn argument.  What evidence do you have that such and such a system sucks?

Before I really get into it, I would like to point out that no, the Wii will not be entering this battle, because Nintendo has failed to join the next generation of consoles, but are still doing extremely well for their cheap little motion sensing machine.

So let's get started.. I'm going to do some comparisons.  This is from my PERSONAL opinion, I have owned both consoles and have experienced them pretty equally I'd say.

The Games


What console has the best game library?  Well it's hard to say...  The majority of both game library's are multi-platform games, that means both consoles have them.  So if you're into Call of Duty, each console will play these games just as good.  Of course there has been evidence that for some reason, some multi-platform games don't work as well on the PS3 as they do on 360, Bayonetta being one of these games.  This is probably due to the fact that a lot of these games are designed on the Xbox 360 first, and than made for the PS3 later, more than likely a hardware compatibility thing, but I'll get into that later.

So we can't judge these consoles on multi-platform, that's for certain, because they both have them.  Comparing the graphics on them doesn't work because they look pretty much identical with maybe different brightness or lighting, but this usually has to do with the TV too.

Imagine your favourite console is in his hands..
Xbox 360 Exclusives:

Alan Wake
Dead Rising series
Fable series
Forza series
Gears of War series
Halo series (including Halo Wars)
Lost Odyssey
Mass Effect
Saints Row series

Playstation 3 Exclusives:

God of War 3
Killzone series
Uncharted series
Metal Gear Solid 4
Infamous series
Heavy Rain
Gran Turismo 5
Demon Souls series
Little Big Planet


Now I know there's definitely more than just those, but I feel those are the most notable ones from each console.  Not all of these games interest me at all.  Games like Forza and Gran Turismo just don't float my boat.  For me, there's more games on the 360 front than there are for PS3, that interest me.

My picks from both:

Xbox 360:

Alan Wake
Halo series
Fable series
Gears of War series
Dead Rising series
Mass Effect
Lost Odyssey

PS3:

Metal Gear Solid 4
Uncharted 2
God of War 3
Killzone 2

It's pretty obvious that I'm more into the hardcore games than anything else.  Xbox 360 offers more in the realm of exclusives.  However, the PS3 exclusive games are very heavy hitters, I enjoyed MGS4 and God of War 3 immensely.  There's definitely talent there, but PS3 doesn't have enough of these and not enough original games that aren't sequals.  All of the other games besides Halo and Fable are original to the Xbox 360 and are new innovative ideas, where as all of the PS3 games I've listed come from either a PS2 game or is a sequal.  Uncharted being probably the only original idea, taking a spin on Tomb Raider/Gears of War.  That being said, sony's original games that came from PS2 have excellent story and gameplay "with the exception of Killzone, the story in that kind blew".

Please keep in mind that this is all personal preference.


Online Gaming

*squeaky*PWND! N00B*squeaky* "FFFFUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!"


This is where a lot of the debates start between the 2 consoles..  Mainly because PS3 has a benefit of free online with an option to upgrade for more content etc.  Where as 360 is about $60 for 13 months of online play.  I agree to an extent that online gaming should be free, if you pay for a game you should be entitled to all of its features.  But I see this as a World of Warcraft effect.  Blizzard charges roughly $15/month to play their game, and they've been doing that for year.  You buy the game, and you end up paying for it forever...  Play on private servers, it'll save you a lot of dough and it's pretty much the exact same as retail, with some minor bugs here and there...

When it comes to online games.. this, for me, is the decider.  People will buy the console that their friends play.  In my case it's Xbox 360, because everything that we play online is pretty much muti-platform, so there's really no argument you can make.

Xbox 360:

Xbox Live - $60 for 13 months of online play + services

I prefer this because Xbox has the party chat option where you can have up to 8 people in the same chat, you can watch movies together while online, play games, and video chat etc.

PS3:

PSN - Free online play and access to some services

Playstation Plus - $50 for 12 months of access to services similar to those of xbox live.


I haven't seen PSN lately, so don't get mad at me if I missed some things, I've never experienced a party chat or video chat and whatnot on PSN when I owned the PS3 console, it may have changed since than.

From my standpoint, I'd choose XBL, because all of my friends play on Xbox live, and that's quite a bit of people, so I usually always had someone to play with.  PS3 I only had 2 friends that weren't online very often.  The services PS+ promotes try to sound exclusive, and I'm sure it is, but from my standpoint, the same services are available to everyone on xbox live, so, everything is exclusive to those who "pay" for it.


Hardware and Innovation

Ok, so, I'm just gonna put it out there.  PS3 definitely has the better hardware inside it's black box.  This is proven through their exclusive games like God of War 3, Uncharted 2, Killzone 2.  All beautiful looking games.  Xbox 360 does have excellent hardware capabilities, almost comparable.  That's why a lot of games are multi-platform.  Games like Gears of War on xbox are quite comparable to those on PS3.  I would consider Gears to be one of the better looking games on Xbox.  Crysis 2 is another game coming out with excellent visual graphics comparable to PS3's top games, however, again, it's multi-platform.

Bottom line is, PS3 has better hardware, but 360 is comparable.  I'm not gonna go into specs and fancy numbers and all that crap, no body cares.  The bigger the number the better isn't always the case, so shut it!

We've gotten past the hardware, now let get to the innovation...

We should have kept track of the design process a bit more..


I don't care how much of a PS3 fanboy you are, you can't like PS Move, how can ANYBODY like this Lollipop dildo Wii rip off!?  That's literally what it is, when it comes to innovation, I put a huge fail stamp on sonys forehead.  The Move is basically a high definition wii console, but the bottom line is, it's been done.  People into this stuff probably already have a wii, most PS owners are hardcore gamers and don't want to pay $180+ to play with a Dildo that has a light up ball.  There might be some girls who do.. I dunno.  The wii has already done this, established the market and have the games for it.  Sony is very late to the plate, and weren't even original on the concept, they didn't even bother to try and change it.  It's exactly the same as the wii!  Come on sony!  Don't be stupid, stupid!

This used to be Natal, than people made fun of it :(
This, is more like it.  Microsoft definitely stepped up to the plate on this one.  Again, this is a product of the Wii's success.  Instead of following suit and making yet another motion controller, they came up with the Kinect motion tracking camera.  They completely eliminated the controller and let people play games with their entire body.  I have the Kinect and have to say that it is very well done.  It does however need a larger library, but I feel like Microsoft is on the right track with Kinect.  It becomes more than just a motion control gimmick for sports games, but a voice activated and hand gesture interface for your console.  It's quite basic at the moment, but you can see the future with this device.  Keep in mind I'll always want a controller when playing a shooter.  I quite like Kinect, it differs from the wii and PS3 with the fact it has no controller.  Kinect I think is more milestone for the future.  This is a product of good design and innovation.


I'm trying my best to be as unbiased as possible, as I haven't played PS Move.  I just don't feel that Sony made a great decision with Move.  It's overpriced, it's gimmicky, and it feels like one of those knock off 3rd party video game things that is copying the wii.  I've owned a Wii, enjoyed it for a while, and the motion controller thing just isn't for me.  Kinect came with my xbox, so I just ended up owning it.  It was a package deal.


Final Verdict

After everything I've said, I give the edge to the Xbox 360 from my personal experience.  Xbox has the games I want, the online experience I want, and the innovation to keep the platform moving forward.

Sony has always come short for me when it's come to the PS3, I watch every E3 conference with great enthusiasm, waiting to see what they'll show in their press conference.  Every press conference I've watched Sony has talked more about the PS2 than they have with the PS3.  This past year was an exception.  We can all agree that sony has had a hard time getting started with the PS3.  When it first came out it was overpriced, didn't have a great library and was falling behind.  The Blu-Ray player is what  I think really set it behind out of the gate, but it proves to be working for it now, especially since beating out HD DVD's.  Blu-Ray discs are definitely a benefit for the PS3, but I don't see that as a decider.. I can get HD movies that look just as good and can fit them on one DVD and watch it on my HD TV.  The Blu-Ray doesn't have much effect on me.  It's more the TV than the player on that point.  Blu-Ray is definitely a step forward for sony, being able to fit every game on one disc rather than 2, 3, or 4.  But, I've always enjoyed having more discs for some reason... I just feel like I'm getting more for my money when that happens.

The one thing I didn't mention in here was the failure rate Xbox 360 has had in the past.  The reason I didn't is because I never really had that big of a problem with the RROD (red ring of death), and Microsoft has since than seemingly eliminated it from the console.  PS3 also had it's own failure, being the Yellow light of death..  This just wasn't as widely broadcast, but there were plenty of PS3 consoles that have had this happen.

In conclusion, you're experience may differ from mine.  This is based solely on my personal experience with both consoles, and I believe my reasons are valid for thinking what I do.  I'm not perfect in my opinion, no I'm not, however much I like to believe that I am, I know I'm not.  If you disagree, or have a different opinion, you are entitled to it.  But for the love of fuck!  BACK UP YOUR DAMN ARGUMENT!!  Saying Xbox sucks, or PS3 sucks, is invalid and devoid of merit.  Each console has a living thriving fan base, and the very fact that fanboys exist for both sides just proves that neither of the consoles suck.  It's almost like racism in a way isn't it?  Judging something and calling it names just because it's different!  FOR SHAME!

Thus concludes my basic reasoning for favouring Xbox, the title really should have been, "Why I like Xbox better than that piece of trash that calls itself a console shitty garbage disposal of a machine that's better at making coffee than it is at playing video games!"  lololololololololol  ;).

--
by
Mike MacDonald